Why was the first thing that came out of the lips of Indian sources and Special Services in the UK that the gunmen were either british citizens or had links with british muslims.
Why is it that whenever there is a threat british muslims are suspected?
Because there are links to radical muslims in England.
The denial of this report two days after these claims were broadcast, the Secret Services and the British Home Secretary Jacqui Smith, deny this, but can we believe this. A very big and emphatic NO!
So what are we to believe - we will have to wait and see, unless there is a total news blackout, which is very likely, in this the old communist guard of the Communistic labour party of Great Britain.
Sunday, 30 November 2008
Mis-Use of the Disabled Parking Bays
Today at Tesco in Addlestone, Surrey, disabled drivers were parking in bays designated Disabled Parking only. This means that you must have a legal Blue Disabled Parking badge, which must be showing the time that the vehicle arrived and who the badge belongs to.
At the time of my arrival there was several cars I checked on 6 that had no badge displayed and that I had to wait about 10 Min's and others even longer, or they had to park elsewhere.
These Disabled bays are for the sole use of disabled drivers, not for the overflow of family bays with children or anyone else thinking that they can park close to the front entrance and nip in for their shopping.
The Disability Discrimination Act
The Disability Discrimination Act from October 2004, Part III of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 came into effect within the United Kingdom. This legislation places a legal requirement on service providers to ensure that disabled people do not find it unreasonably difficult or impossible to enjoy the service in the same way as non-disabled people.
The Legal Requirements
Whilst the earlier parts of the Act focused primarily on disabled access to buildings, Part III now looks closer at the issue of car parking. A key element of Part III is that service providers that operate a car park now have to 'monitor' their disabled parking bays to prevent abuse by non-disabled drivers. Failure to provide monitoring could result in a heavy financial penalty, as disabled drivers exercise their rights to compensation under the terms of the Act.
This said there are thousands of drivers out there that are illegally using the blue badge to illegally park. Disabled drivers, as well, are allowing people to use them.
Some councils are clamping down on their use and are becoming stricter in their issuing policy and the disabled driver has now to undergo new tests which will persecute those that can only walk a short way without having to take a rest or call for help.
I urge all disabled people, those that have some form of disability that stops them from walking or gives them less control over their walking ability to contact the Member of Parliament and their local Councilors to object to the way the system of issuing the Disability Badge has now focused.
At the time of my arrival there was several cars I checked on 6 that had no badge displayed and that I had to wait about 10 Min's and others even longer, or they had to park elsewhere.
These Disabled bays are for the sole use of disabled drivers, not for the overflow of family bays with children or anyone else thinking that they can park close to the front entrance and nip in for their shopping.
The Disability Discrimination Act
The Disability Discrimination Act from October 2004, Part III of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 came into effect within the United Kingdom. This legislation places a legal requirement on service providers to ensure that disabled people do not find it unreasonably difficult or impossible to enjoy the service in the same way as non-disabled people.
The Legal Requirements
Whilst the earlier parts of the Act focused primarily on disabled access to buildings, Part III now looks closer at the issue of car parking. A key element of Part III is that service providers that operate a car park now have to 'monitor' their disabled parking bays to prevent abuse by non-disabled drivers. Failure to provide monitoring could result in a heavy financial penalty, as disabled drivers exercise their rights to compensation under the terms of the Act.
This said there are thousands of drivers out there that are illegally using the blue badge to illegally park. Disabled drivers, as well, are allowing people to use them.
Some councils are clamping down on their use and are becoming stricter in their issuing policy and the disabled driver has now to undergo new tests which will persecute those that can only walk a short way without having to take a rest or call for help.
I urge all disabled people, those that have some form of disability that stops them from walking or gives them less control over their walking ability to contact the Member of Parliament and their local Councilors to object to the way the system of issuing the Disability Badge has now focused.
Friday, 28 November 2008
A Shadow Politician Arrested for 9 Hours.
There was an arrest and a 9 hour detention for one of the UKs Conservative Shadow Politicians after a rather dubious case of leaks from the Home Office. It is understood that a junior official has been suspended on suspicion leaking sensitive information. Whether this is the same case has yet to be established.
Mr Green was arrested by the police on suspicion of "conspiring to commit misconduct in a public office" and "aiding and abetting, counselling or procuring misconduct in a public office".
It has been reported, BBC News Web-site 28th November 2008, that there have been a number of leaks of information from the Home Office, such as:
Does this mean that the police are acting out of hand without the Home Office knowing anything about these matters, particularly to a high ranking politician, even a shadow minister. Or does it mean there is a political which hunt out to get a liberal politician doing his job.
When it comes down to it I would rather know about information about illegal immigration and why it is so high, why there are illegal immigrants working in the Home Office and, more probably, in other government and local council offices
Mr Green was arrested by the police on suspicion of "conspiring to commit misconduct in a public office" and "aiding and abetting, counselling or procuring misconduct in a public office".
It has been reported, BBC News Web-site 28th November 2008, that there have been a number of leaks of information from the Home Office, such as:
- An illegal immigrant had been employed as a cleaner in the House of Commons
- The Home Secretary knew licences had been granted to security guards who were illegal immigrants.
- The government was also concerned about the leak of a letter in which the home secretary warned that a recession could lead to a rise in crime.
Does this mean that the police are acting out of hand without the Home Office knowing anything about these matters, particularly to a high ranking politician, even a shadow minister. Or does it mean there is a political which hunt out to get a liberal politician doing his job.
When it comes down to it I would rather know about information about illegal immigration and why it is so high, why there are illegal immigrants working in the Home Office and, more probably, in other government and local council offices
Wednesday, 26 November 2008
St Paul's Cathedral - 300 years old
St Paul's Cathedral 300 years old today, Happy Birthday.
It has triumphed through World War II and the Blitz, it has struggled through the ages with erosion from pigeon droppings and acid rain, and it has reached its total of £40,000,000,000 target on it's 300th birthday through public donations.
But why donations?
I agree, that we should donate some money to the upkeep of these magnificent buildings, some of them, particularly in London, dwarfed by their neighbours of the City of London and Docklands, but why shouldn't they receive a proportion of the nations taxes to support them?
Why should tax payers money be spent on the Houses of Parliament?
Shouldn't the Houses of Parliament come under the same restrictions and donations sought from benefactors instead of using tax payers money to repair it?
The established Church in England has as much right to take our taxes as donations as Parliament in Westminster and other Government Buildings.
Instead of fighting for recognition with other immigrant churches and mosques it must be recognised that this is the Nations Heritage and as such must be recognised.
To this end I am writing to my local MP for some answers, but it may come under the Freedom of Information Act.
It has triumphed through World War II and the Blitz, it has struggled through the ages with erosion from pigeon droppings and acid rain, and it has reached its total of £40,000,000,000 target on it's 300th birthday through public donations.
But why donations?
I agree, that we should donate some money to the upkeep of these magnificent buildings, some of them, particularly in London, dwarfed by their neighbours of the City of London and Docklands, but why shouldn't they receive a proportion of the nations taxes to support them?
Why should tax payers money be spent on the Houses of Parliament?
Shouldn't the Houses of Parliament come under the same restrictions and donations sought from benefactors instead of using tax payers money to repair it?
The established Church in England has as much right to take our taxes as donations as Parliament in Westminster and other Government Buildings.
Instead of fighting for recognition with other immigrant churches and mosques it must be recognised that this is the Nations Heritage and as such must be recognised.
To this end I am writing to my local MP for some answers, but it may come under the Freedom of Information Act.
Monday, 24 November 2008
Gordon Brown IS the Chancellor of the Exchequor
Ever since the un-opposed election, a travesty in my opinion, of Gordon Brown to that coveted position of Prime Minister, Gordon Brown has been the man pulling the strings behind Alistair Darling, and if ever there was/is a fall guy it is to be Alistair Darling.
It was always my view that this was the position and today I heard on the BBC that this was a presumption that everyone in the media had.
Gordon Brown was the Chancellor for around 10 years and everything that I have seen to date whilst he has been in the coveted PM seat smacks of his hand.
It was always my view that this was the position and today I heard on the BBC that this was a presumption that everyone in the media had.
Gordon Brown was the Chancellor for around 10 years and everything that I have seen to date whilst he has been in the coveted PM seat smacks of his hand.
Saturday, 22 November 2008
Gordon Brown, Alistair Darling and the UK finances
We are to expect a rise in government borrowing to fund a massive spending spree by the labour party who says it will help us, the tax payers, to ease the financial crisis by tax reductions, giving us more money in our pockets.
It was reported also, that the government has already borrowed 34,000,000,000,000 pounds this year, most of it before this financial crisis. They now want to borrow a reported 15,000,000,000,000 pounds to give us so called massive tax cuts.
How will this be paid for? By heavily taxing us in a couple of years and then b by blaming the world financial crisis, when they think that we have forgotten it. They are blaming the UK crisis on the world financial affair already, which they have from the beginning, if I remember correctly.
Gordon Brown, in 1999, sold 4bn of the UK gold reserves when he was Chancellor of the Exchequer leaving Britain with the lowest bullion holdings of any country. It was reported to have been converted to Euros, Yen and Dollars leaving us with only 7% of gold reserves out of 17%. Not a lot. Although it was denied, it was reported at the time that this was to ease us, the UK, covertly, into a single currency in the euro-zone.
Hopefully, when their is an election, the voters in the UK will see through his policies and see the foolishness in his plans. Whoever gets in will have to tax the country harder to pay for his foolishness, by borrowing billions of pounds and getting this country into such large debt that it will take years to recover.
At the moment a Conservative or Liberal government would do better than this lame duck prime minister/chancellor.
It was reported also, that the government has already borrowed 34,000,000,000,000 pounds this year, most of it before this financial crisis. They now want to borrow a reported 15,000,000,000,000 pounds to give us so called massive tax cuts.
How will this be paid for? By heavily taxing us in a couple of years and then b by blaming the world financial crisis, when they think that we have forgotten it. They are blaming the UK crisis on the world financial affair already, which they have from the beginning, if I remember correctly.
Gordon Brown, in 1999, sold 4bn of the UK gold reserves when he was Chancellor of the Exchequer leaving Britain with the lowest bullion holdings of any country. It was reported to have been converted to Euros, Yen and Dollars leaving us with only 7% of gold reserves out of 17%. Not a lot. Although it was denied, it was reported at the time that this was to ease us, the UK, covertly, into a single currency in the euro-zone.
Hopefully, when their is an election, the voters in the UK will see through his policies and see the foolishness in his plans. Whoever gets in will have to tax the country harder to pay for his foolishness, by borrowing billions of pounds and getting this country into such large debt that it will take years to recover.
At the moment a Conservative or Liberal government would do better than this lame duck prime minister/chancellor.
Sunday, 16 November 2008
Prince Charles & 'Defender of THE Faith'
In the past, not least during his 60th birthday celebrations, Prince Charles has come out in his views of being defender of faith instead of Defender Of The Faith. [sic]
[You must know by now any title I don't believe in is written without capitalisation. Nick]
In the early part of the 14th Century (around 1530) the title 'Defender Of The Faith' was given to Henry VIII by Pope Gregory for his dealings and denunciation of Martin Luther and his Protestant Church, amongst others.
It was also in 1533 that Henry VIII wanted to divorce Catherine of Aragon to marry Anne Boleyn as Catherine had only conceived a daughter, Mary, and didn't have a male heir. Anne produced two females one eventually being Queen Elizabeth I, before being beheaded for adultery. The rest this story can be read in other places.
One reason why England became an Anglican country was that Henry VIII wanted to divorce Catherine to wed the pregnant Anne. He was denied by Pope Clement VII and the only way Henry could get what he wanted, was to turn this country's faith from Roman Catholic to an Anglican 'Church of England' State by using laws, and his powers, to make England a country overseen by an English Monarch who was Head of State, Defender of The Faith.
This situation lasted until Charles I went to a Civil War with Cromwell and Parliament. Charles I lost the Civil War and Cromwell and Parliament removed the kings head. We then became a Parliamentary State and, eventually, after years of wrangling in Parliament, with King Charles II Head of State and Defender Of The Faith.
We, the English people, have had many situations in the latter half of the 20th century, where Parliament i.e. the labour party, has wanted to dissolve the governance of the Queen as Head of State, as many socialist and communist countries have done so around the world.
I firmly believe Prince Charles, in his naive way, is falling deftly into their trap.
By making England a multi-cultural society, the labour party is knowingly reducing standards to accommodate the so called ethnic minorities, with their many diverse religions and mother tongues to relieve the English of their own high standards of morality and religeon.
Even Rowen Williams has been involved in talking about integrating Sharia Law into English Law. Will we see next the wearing of muslim headdress by English women fearful of Sharia Law?
Some say that some of Jewish Laws are integrated into our system, but Jewish Law is not as harsh as Sharia Law and not so brutal.
Prince Charles must look at these cultures as Head of State, but I believe firmly in the upholding of the Church of England and the Defender of THE Faith.
[You must know by now any title I don't believe in is written without capitalisation. Nick]
In the early part of the 14th Century (around 1530) the title 'Defender Of The Faith' was given to Henry VIII by Pope Gregory for his dealings and denunciation of Martin Luther and his Protestant Church, amongst others.
It was also in 1533 that Henry VIII wanted to divorce Catherine of Aragon to marry Anne Boleyn as Catherine had only conceived a daughter, Mary, and didn't have a male heir. Anne produced two females one eventually being Queen Elizabeth I, before being beheaded for adultery. The rest this story can be read in other places.
One reason why England became an Anglican country was that Henry VIII wanted to divorce Catherine to wed the pregnant Anne. He was denied by Pope Clement VII and the only way Henry could get what he wanted, was to turn this country's faith from Roman Catholic to an Anglican 'Church of England' State by using laws, and his powers, to make England a country overseen by an English Monarch who was Head of State, Defender of The Faith.
This situation lasted until Charles I went to a Civil War with Cromwell and Parliament. Charles I lost the Civil War and Cromwell and Parliament removed the kings head. We then became a Parliamentary State and, eventually, after years of wrangling in Parliament, with King Charles II Head of State and Defender Of The Faith.
We, the English people, have had many situations in the latter half of the 20th century, where Parliament i.e. the labour party, has wanted to dissolve the governance of the Queen as Head of State, as many socialist and communist countries have done so around the world.
I firmly believe Prince Charles, in his naive way, is falling deftly into their trap.
By making England a multi-cultural society, the labour party is knowingly reducing standards to accommodate the so called ethnic minorities, with their many diverse religions and mother tongues to relieve the English of their own high standards of morality and religeon.
Even Rowen Williams has been involved in talking about integrating Sharia Law into English Law. Will we see next the wearing of muslim headdress by English women fearful of Sharia Law?
Some say that some of Jewish Laws are integrated into our system, but Jewish Law is not as harsh as Sharia Law and not so brutal.
Prince Charles must look at these cultures as Head of State, but I believe firmly in the upholding of the Church of England and the Defender of THE Faith.
Friday, 14 November 2008
The death of Baby P.
So, Harringey Council have done it again and allowed a baby in their Borough to die in the hands of its mother and two of her men. The boy named baby P was brutally beaten and died after being alive for just 17 months.
Baby P. had been seen 60 times during this time but nothing had been done to take either the baby into care or to take action against the adults who were supposed to look after him.
It has now been announced that a 'whistle blower' warned the government that there was a problem with children in the Borough.
How long will it take this labour government to clamp down hard on its own labour councils and take them over, as they must, to protect the children in this country.
Baby P. had been seen 60 times during this time but nothing had been done to take either the baby into care or to take action against the adults who were supposed to look after him.
It has now been announced that a 'whistle blower' warned the government that there was a problem with children in the Borough.
How long will it take this labour government to clamp down hard on its own labour councils and take them over, as they must, to protect the children in this country.
Tuesday, 11 November 2008
Welcome
Are my thoughts political? Some say that all things are political. But is the way one thinks, or the direction of ones thoughts, given to you from your parents from conception, born with you from your first breath, the way you see the world when you are growing up and the injusticies that you see along life's highway, political?
There are laws being made in England that the English, like me, cannot talk about, legally or emotionally as we have been gagged in such a way as to be frightened by laws made seemingly for the good of the nation, but instead to gag freedom of speech, unless one happens to be a religious leader or leader of other group in charge of a foreign, non-English group.
I am not right or left wing, but I believe my rights in England are being eroded away by a government that wants to dumb down Englishness in favour of Britishness.
So, it appears that I cannot talk about many subjects that concern me. My free speech has been curtailed by draconian laws that give freedoms to other groups but not me an Englishman.
So there we have it my blog on 'My Political Thoughts?'
There are laws being made in England that the English, like me, cannot talk about, legally or emotionally as we have been gagged in such a way as to be frightened by laws made seemingly for the good of the nation, but instead to gag freedom of speech, unless one happens to be a religious leader or leader of other group in charge of a foreign, non-English group.
I am not right or left wing, but I believe my rights in England are being eroded away by a government that wants to dumb down Englishness in favour of Britishness.
So, it appears that I cannot talk about many subjects that concern me. My free speech has been curtailed by draconian laws that give freedoms to other groups but not me an Englishman.
So there we have it my blog on 'My Political Thoughts?'
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
